The difference in technique is because in Medina, there was an anundance of reliable ahadith that scholars could depend from, since the prophet lived the 1o yrs of his life there. On the other hand, the non traditionalist jurists had to depend on analogy as the sources were not as reliable in Iraq. Ijma and Qiyas derive their value or ing to qiyas, for the object of contract (maball aUaqd), i.e., the goods, does not exist at the time of the contract. But qiyas is not applicable here be cause of the tradition of Prophet who permitted it. The example of istihsan on the basis of ijma' is to get things manu factured by placing an order (istifna'). This contract is also not valid The difference between the two stages of reasoning is that in takhrij al-manat the jurist is dealing with a situation where the `illah is not identified, Al-Basri has claimed an 'ijma on both one and two above. 3) Qiyas in which both the asl and the 'illah are founded in speculative nusus, in which case it is no more than a speculative form Ijmāʿ ( Arabic: إجماع ʾiǧmāʿ [ʔɪd͡ʒˈmæːʕ], "consensus") is an Arabic term referring to the consensus or agreement of the Islamic community on a point of Islamic law. Sunni Muslims regard ijmā' as one of the secondary sources of Sharia law, after the Qur'an, and the Sunnah . Relied more on Qiyas, The Ijma which are consistant with Quran and Sunnah, iv. Zaif and Mursal traditions; The difference between them is more of a degree than of nature. Vay Tiền Nhanh Chỉ Cần Cmnd.

difference between ijma and qiyas